Q&A: The Pope’s New Document on Climate Change Is a ‘Throwdown’ Call for Action

From our collaborating partner “Living on Earth,” public radio’s environmental news magazine, an interview by Producer Paloma Beltran with Christiana Zenner, an associate professor in the Department of Theology at  Fordham University in New York. 

PALOMA BELTRAN: In June 2015, Pope Francis published a groundbreaking document that made a theological case for climate action called Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. That fall, in a rare moment of unity, nations established the landmark Paris Climate Agreement. 

Now, eight years later, the Pope is back with an even bolder update. In “Laudate Deum,” or “Praise God,” Pope Francis says the world is “nearing the breaking point,” condemns climate denial, and calls for urgent climate action. The Roman Catholic church he leads is the largest Christian denomination and has over a billion followers around the world. 

Christiana Zenner is an Associate Professor in the Department of Theology for Fordham University who is currently working on a book about the Pope’s writings on the climate.

So there’s a lot of really specific citation of science, there is a lot of very specific invocations about the kinds of things that need to happen. And then there is a little bit of philosophical and theological framing. But it’s a really punchy document. 

And at some points, it’s actually even a little bit snarky. He calls out the U.S. explicitly in the penultimate paragraph of the exhortation. He says the rates of consumption are so far above China, and even more profoundly above peoples and nations that are far less developed. And so he’s really taking language that is similar to the Kyoto Protocol and other kinds of agreements that see consumption by particular nations as historically problematic and in an ongoing way. 

It’s also, I think, taking a pretty specific aim at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and climate denialists. As you may know, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has been pretty focused on pelvic issues, on abortion and contraception, etc, as its primary moral focus. And I think that it’s no accident that the Pope uses a U.S. bishop’s document from 2019 on climate change as the first citation, and then ends the document with this throwdown about U.S. consumption. I think that’s a pretty substantial frame.

BELTRAN: It seems like Pope Francis is not beating around the bush when it comes to climate change.

ZENNER: Oh, he is not. This is a throwdown document. It’s really a zinger. So he’s also then, especially in the first part of the apostolic exhortation, talking about climate denialism. And just taking it down, point by point. He just says, no, this doesn’t hold, this is not tenable. This is not a Catholic point of view, it’s not even a reasonable point of view. And let me show you why. 

And so in a very effective way, he just critiques those arguments. So, for example, he says that in recent years, some have chosen to deride these facts, he’s speaking of climate change. Then he says, they’ll bring up the allegedly solid scientific data, like the fact that the planet has always had and will have periods of cooling and warming. 

But then he goes on to say, they forget to mention another relevant datum, that what we are presently experiencing is an unusual acceleration of warming at such a speed that it will take only one generation in order to verify it. And he does this a number of times, this language that is basically some claim, or some deride these facts, and they’ll present this kind of claim, but they forget to include this other additional claim. And so in a way that is rhetorically powerful and philosophically grounded, he’s calling those folks to task and saying your philosophy is bad and your science is too. Get with it.

BELTRAN: So what does this document say about the connection between the Catholic Church and the scientific world?

ZENNER: One of the things that’s really interesting, and in many respects great about the Catholic Church, is that in the late 20th century especially, it has had a pretty robust engagement with contemporary sciences of the time. And this document continues that trend. 

So if you look at the citations, like scholars love to do, if you follow the footnotes, there are tons of citations to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, these kinds of consensus documents that indicate the patterns, extent and implications of anthropogenic climate change. And so not only are those in the footnotes supporting a range of claims, there’s also explicit numbers throughout the document. 

So I would say there’s a huge relationship between the Catholic Church and science in this document. Because a lot of people think, oh, the Catholic Church. Science. Well, Galileo, that didn’t go well. But when we delve into it, you know, absolutely, yes, lots of problems going on in that era for sure. But there are also always really interesting moments that religious institutions, in this case, the Catholic Church, can assess developments in science and either hunker down and refuse to engage the questions raised, or say, wow, this looks like a big issue. What does this mean for theology, for morality, and for the project of being human? And that’s what the Pope has chosen to do.

BELTRAN: Christiana, what surprised you the most about Laudate Deum?

ZENNER: What surprised me the most? Well, I think there are a few things. One is how pithy and direct it is. The Pope knows what he’s doing in this. And the structure of the apostolic exhortation, as well as the tone is remarkably direct, very readable, and, in many ways, at least from an interdisciplinary ethics perspective, irrefutable on the dynamics of climate change, and the science behind it, economic growth presumptions and the dynamics of consumerism, and what Pope Francis calls in a slightly more philosophical and theological way, the technocratic paradigm, which is a fetishization of economic efficiency and technological innovation. 

The presumption that those alone will solve ecological or social problems. So I was, really, frankly, stunned and really happy to see someone who is in a position of authority, yes, in a hierarchical patriarchal context that has massive problems. But as we saw in the reception of the 2015 Laudato Si’ document, he’s in a position to get people’s attention. 

There’s one citation in there, citation 41, of feminist philosopher of science, Donna Haraway. She’s an American, a long standing professor at the University of California Santa Cruz, someone who’s been very critical of normative gender hierarchies as they play out in the practice and conceptualization of science, and a real advocate for multi-species relations. So she shows up in footnote 41, which is shocking, because she’s on record as being anti-Catholic, anti-institutionally-Catholic, and anti-theistic in that sense. So, how on earth did this citation get into the apostolic exhortation? And what does it mean? I am fascinated and a number of us are trying to dig into this.

BELTRAN: So Pope Francis cited Donna Haraway, what did he say there?

ZENNER: So she is cited in a section on anthropocentrism. The idea that humans are at the center functionally, as well as morally, of the earth and of theological significance. And so Pope Francis says, the technocratic paradigm, which he had earlier critiqued, can deceive us by making us forget that the entire world is a contact zone. 

And he cites this book by Donna Haraway, called When Species Meet. And then the section goes on to talk about well, we can’t have a full anthropocentrism where humans are the only or exclusive focus, we need a situated anthropocentrism that recognizes the interrelations and the limits to human centrality and power. 

It is completely fascinating that the Pope chooses to cite her or the Pope’s ghost writers, don’t know which one.  But it’s kind of a two-part thing. There’s that whole reaction of, oh my gosh, what on earth? And then the second part is, isn’t it interesting, that of all the women to cite, all of the experts who happen to be women, the one he cites is Donna Haraway. And not the many, many, many women within the Catholic Church.

Celia Deane-Drummond, Brazilian ecofeminist liberation theologian Ivone Gebara, there are so many brilliant scholars who are women who have been working with eco-theologies and orders of nuns who have been implementing ideas like this that far preceded even Laudato Si’ in 2015. 

So the citation of Haraway is doubly bizarre. Because why not cite women who are also engaging in the work of the church? And one skeptical answer is, well, there’s a long history of excluding them. And maybe it would mean that their critiques would have to be taken seriously. I don’t know. But it’s one viable hypothesis.

BELTRAN: In Laudate Deum, Pope Francis specifically discusses COP28, the United Nations Climate Change Conference beginning in late November in Dubai. What do you make of these mentions?

ZENNER: I think it’s really interesting and exciting that Pope Francis is focusing this document on COP28. So clearly, this document is meant to have a practical political lifestyle impact. And what I think is so distinctive about his approach in Laudate Deum, this 2023 document, is that he has a whole section on COP28. 

And he says that if we are confident in the capacity of human beings to transcend their petty interests, and to think in bigger terms, we can keep hoping that COP28 will allow for a decisive acceleration of energy transition with effective commitments subject to ongoing monitoring. And he goes on—there needs to be binding forms of energy transitions that meet three conditions: efficient, obligatory and readily monitored. 

And then he later says, and everyone needs to commit to them, it can’t just be a kind of exceptional thing. So I think this is pretty remarkable, because he’s basically saying, here’s what you guys need to do: get it together. And in Section 58, he has a defense of climate activists. 

This is really important, because around the world, we’re seeing the silencing and the jailing of climate activists in a range of contexts. And so into that space, Pope Francis says in paragraph 58, in conferences on the climate, the actions of groups negatively portrayed as radicalized, radicalized is in quotes, tend to attract attention. But he continues, in reality, they are filling a space left empty by society as a whole, which ought to exercise a healthy pressure. 

So this idea that there’s a need for what he calls a multilateralism from below, that the voices of activists, the voices of people affected by these things, that this matters, I think, is really, really significant.

BELTRAN: And after the Pope has written and published this, what happens next? What are Catholics expected to do with this?

ZENNER: On the one hand, it’s in the written record, the Vatican archives, as a pretty authoritative document, that anyone in the world or anyone of goodwill, who is the intended audience of this document according to Pope Francis, that anyone in the world can access. 

I think it will be a resource for nonprofit organizations and branches of the church and parish communities who really want to take up the call to reflect theologically and in terms of ethical action, and maybe even in terms of activism. I don’t know how priests and other formal representatives of the church, especially in the United States, will engage it. I think that’s one of the questions that remains to be seen. But as I’ve said, it’s a pretty fascinating, concise, pithy zinger of a document that is doing something exciting, so I’m interested to see what happens with it.

BELTRAN: Christiana Zenner is an associate professor of theology, science and ethics at Fordham University. Christiana, thanks so much for taking the time with us today. 

ZENNER: Thank you for having me.

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.